Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Topkapi manuscript

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. A valid rationale for deletion is not present. See WP:DEL-REASON for examples of valid rationales. If interested in a potential merge, such discussion can occur outside of the purview of AfD. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:20, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Topkapi manuscript[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page is more fully developed in Samarkand Kufic Quran and Early Quranic manuscripts (section Topkapi manuscript) 149.154.232.200 (talk) 15:45, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 January 2. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:01, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Unclear reason for deletion. The page cited by the nominator seems to be about a manuscript held in a different location. They seem to have similar reputed historical origins (e.g., Uthman). Without great knowledge in this topic area, it seems separately notable to me. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:01, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.