Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuzzy locating system

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. See WP:SOFTDELETE. Kurykh (talk) 00:57, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fuzzy locating system

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

100% unreferenced OR tagged since 2013. No significant presence of this term in google search. Staszek Lem (talk) 00:10, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:45, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:TNT may be warranted, but I found literature mentions - here or there (paywall), and the references of those. Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 17:17, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, there are occasional usage. Some years ago heuristic of "fuzzy algorithms" based on fuzzy sets were popular newspash, and articles cropped up to apply to nearly all real-world problems. But this particular article is a 100% OR and the author seems lost interest. Staszek Lem (talk) 17:43, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 08:01, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.