Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imran Ali (WAPDA cricketer)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of Water and Power Development Authority cricketers. Spartaz Humbug! 11:08, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Imran Ali (WAPDA cricketer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG, no coverage found. Störm (talk) 19:51, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:53, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:53, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:53, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect to List of Water and Power Development Authority cricketers, per consensus from countless earlier AFDs and other discussions. Trivially passes NCRIC but there is no WP:SIGCOV available, and highly unlikely any exists, given this is a player who only appeared in a couple of recorded matches. wjematherplease leave a message... 20:01, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep As with so many other AfDs, this request has been made on the basis of WP:GNG when the relevant standard is WP:CRIN which is passed by virtue of having played first class cricket (as indeed is noted by Wjemather above. WP:SIGCOV is unimportant when WP:CRIN is passed. DevaCat1 (talk) 17:37, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- Unfortunately you have it backwards. There is clear consensus from endless discussions, AFDs and RFCs that NSPORT guidelines do not override GNG. And in the case of NCRIC, SIGCOV is a requirement. wjematherplease leave a message... 18:03, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect to List of Water and Power Development Authority cricketers or similar Has played 2 FC matches, but no coverage. Using similar precedent to that used by WP:FOOTY when a player has 1 or a few matches but no coverage, they are deleted/redirected. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 18:19, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep played in FC matches, meeting WP:NCRIC. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 13:10, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete the minimum stanrard to keep articles is GNG. The cricket inclusion standards are a bunch of rubbish and have been over and over again been shown to not at all predict actual passing of GNG. This article very clearly fails the multiple significant prong of GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:41, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.