Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Barnes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 11:11, 26 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:49, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jamie Barnes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Don't believe he meets WP:MUSBIO. He has released 2 albums on what appear to be Indie labels but I suspect they aren't one of the more notable as required by #5. The link to Billboard is dead and a search for his name on Billboard.com doesn't return anything Gbawden (talk) 18:14, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak KeepDelete: Via two references, especially the second, Barnes, I think is mildly over the fence into notability. Of course, it wouldn't hurt if more material and references were added to the article. I'll try to spend some time early next week doing just that. I'm not an indie music enthusiast per se, but I've heard his name pop up a lot, so I'm confident of finding more info to buttress his notability. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 20:26, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • After an exhaustive search, while I do see the subject's name pop up a lot, it's in music-related blogs, social media sites, and music selling sites, rather than what most people would call strong secondary sources. A song of his was recently used in the film 2nd Serve, but that essentially straight-to-Netflix movie doesn't have an article yet (if it's even notable). So, based on the LEO reference and the performer's high-quality work (a seemingly common impression), while I believe this artist is on the cusp of broader notability, he is currently notable only from a local perspective. So I vote to delete, but without any prejudice to the reintroduction of the article at a later time. Jamie, if you're reading, keep up the great work! Stevie is the man! TalkWork 13:38, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:18, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:18, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.