Jump to content

User talk:Zenkaino lovelive

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Zenkaino lovelive (talk | contribs) at 00:30, 9 March 2022 (→‎Blocked indefinitely: ping to Betty Logan). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Blocked indefinitely

As you immediately resumed your disruptive behaviour, I have reblocked you indefinitely. --Yamla (talk) 10:36, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. Then what should I do? Zenkaino lovelive (talk) 11:10, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zenkaino lovelive (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm sorry to make my disruptive behaviour. If I'm unblocked, I WON'T make a discussion to change the color scheme in like Motion picture content rating system for at least half a year. I would like to contribute in language-related and Microsoft Windows-related articles. Zenkaino lovelive (talk) 18:54, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:50, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zenkaino lovelive (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

1. I understand what I've been blocked for: I'm sorry to make my disruptive behaviour which is to suggest pointless color scheme replacement of the articles like Motion picture content rating system. 2. I won't continue to cause damage or disruption: I will NOT make a discussion to change the color scheme in those articles. Also, if I think that any articles have incorrect parts, I'll write a draft and will make a discussion before putting information. 3. I'll make useful contributions instead: I would make productive contributions by adding true information only, and if a conflict is occurred, I'll talk or discuss it first. I would like to contribute in language-related and Microsoft Windows-related articles, etc. I'm politely requesting to review my block. Zenkaino lovelive (talk) 01:13, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Last time you were unblocked it was because of this discussion: [1].

You made promises, apologies, all of the same things you are doing now. It was made clear to you there that there won't be a lot of tolerance for future disruption. You lasted barely 1 day here after that. You have used up your credibility. I am declining your unblock request. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 04:14, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Then what should I do? Zenkaino lovelive (talk) 04:33, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Find another hobby. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 04:43, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Then I'll pursue WP:SO - that means no editing for six months, yes, six months, and then requesting an unblock here. Does edits to my talk page also reset the six month timer?GN said to me, "No.". Zenkaino lovelive (talk) 04:50, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TheresNoTime: Thanks for answering. Then what should I do until December? Zenkaino lovelive (talk) 04:08, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing on the Wikipedia. Zero edits until the end of January, 2022. --Yamla (talk) 10:05, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for answering. Then I won't edit except my talk page for 6 months and will appeal in January. Zenkaino lovelive (talk) 03:04, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You emailed me. No, I'm not interested in a conversation by email. --Yamla (talk) 10:22, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Six months from this user's last edit is 9 March, 2022. --Yamla (talk) 21:49, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Zenkaino, you have been banned from WP:Discord as you continuously kept bringing up your block despite numerous warnings. If and when you succeed in appealing your block, you may contact me for an unban. -- ferret (talk) 17:04, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Zenkaino lovelive (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, it's 2022 now and I want a new chance for me to be a better Wikipedian here. I got blocked from Wikipedia in last July, because of my immediate resumption of pointless color scheme replacement suggestions, as it consituted disruptive edits. I'm still getting used to editing again on Wikipedia after having been unblocked around 8 months ago, and I'm trying to make the table more understandable, but I fully realize my behavior was disruptive. To be unblocked, blocked users have to leave Wikipedia for at least 6 months, including their talk page, and then they have to request to be unblocked at their main account. I'm trying not to make the same mistakes from the past. I understand, regret, and apologize for my past mistakes after 8 months passed. I'm not a teenager anymore, but I'm a young adult. Please unblock me and I'll make sure not to suggest pointless color scheme replacement. I don't want be blocked forever, especially after almost 2 11/12 years of previously being blocked. If I'm unblocked, I will be a productive editor who always consults his fellow Wikipedians. I plan to make small and non-controversial contributions on language and Windows articles to English Wikipedia, and always discuss larger or more significant changes on the talk page or in a draft first. I haven't edited Wikipedia at all since I been reblocked because if I were to do that, that would impact my changes of getting unblocked. Please unblock me and thank you for your consideration. Zenkaino lovelive (talk) 00:06, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Hello, it's 2022 now and I want a new chance for me to be a better Wikipedian here. I got blocked from Wikipedia in last July, because of my immediate resumption of pointless color scheme replacement suggestions, as it consituted disruptive edits. I'm still getting used to editing again on Wikipedia after having been unblocked around 8 months ago, and I'm trying to make the table more understandable, but I fully realize my behavior was disruptive. To be unblocked, blocked users have to leave Wikipedia for at least 6 months, including their talk page, and then they have to request to be unblocked at their main account. I'm trying not to make the same mistakes from the past. I understand, regret, and apologize for my past mistakes after 8 months passed. I'm not a teenager anymore, but I'm a young adult. Please unblock me and I'll make sure not to suggest pointless color scheme replacement. I don't want be blocked forever, especially after almost 2 11/12 years of previously being blocked. If I'm unblocked, I will be a productive editor who always consults his fellow Wikipedians. I plan to make small and non-controversial contributions on language and Windows articles to English Wikipedia, and always discuss larger or more significant changes on the talk page or in a draft first. I haven't edited Wikipedia at all since I been reblocked because if I were to do that, that would impact my changes of getting unblocked. Please unblock me and thank you for your consideration. [[User:Zenkaino lovelive|Zenkaino lovelive]] ([[User talk:Zenkaino lovelive#top|talk]]) 00:06, 9 March 2022 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hello, it's 2022 now and I want a new chance for me to be a better Wikipedian here. I got blocked from Wikipedia in last July, because of my immediate resumption of pointless color scheme replacement suggestions, as it consituted disruptive edits. I'm still getting used to editing again on Wikipedia after having been unblocked around 8 months ago, and I'm trying to make the table more understandable, but I fully realize my behavior was disruptive. To be unblocked, blocked users have to leave Wikipedia for at least 6 months, including their talk page, and then they have to request to be unblocked at their main account. I'm trying not to make the same mistakes from the past. I understand, regret, and apologize for my past mistakes after 8 months passed. I'm not a teenager anymore, but I'm a young adult. Please unblock me and I'll make sure not to suggest pointless color scheme replacement. I don't want be blocked forever, especially after almost 2 11/12 years of previously being blocked. If I'm unblocked, I will be a productive editor who always consults his fellow Wikipedians. I plan to make small and non-controversial contributions on language and Windows articles to English Wikipedia, and always discuss larger or more significant changes on the talk page or in a draft first. I haven't edited Wikipedia at all since I been reblocked because if I were to do that, that would impact my changes of getting unblocked. Please unblock me and thank you for your consideration. [[User:Zenkaino lovelive|Zenkaino lovelive]] ([[User talk:Zenkaino lovelive#top|talk]]) 00:06, 9 March 2022 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hello, it's 2022 now and I want a new chance for me to be a better Wikipedian here. I got blocked from Wikipedia in last July, because of my immediate resumption of pointless color scheme replacement suggestions, as it consituted disruptive edits. I'm still getting used to editing again on Wikipedia after having been unblocked around 8 months ago, and I'm trying to make the table more understandable, but I fully realize my behavior was disruptive. To be unblocked, blocked users have to leave Wikipedia for at least 6 months, including their talk page, and then they have to request to be unblocked at their main account. I'm trying not to make the same mistakes from the past. I understand, regret, and apologize for my past mistakes after 8 months passed. I'm not a teenager anymore, but I'm a young adult. Please unblock me and I'll make sure not to suggest pointless color scheme replacement. I don't want be blocked forever, especially after almost 2 11/12 years of previously being blocked. If I'm unblocked, I will be a productive editor who always consults his fellow Wikipedians. I plan to make small and non-controversial contributions on language and Windows articles to English Wikipedia, and always discuss larger or more significant changes on the talk page or in a draft first. I haven't edited Wikipedia at all since I been reblocked because if I were to do that, that would impact my changes of getting unblocked. Please unblock me and thank you for your consideration. [[User:Zenkaino lovelive|Zenkaino lovelive]] ([[User talk:Zenkaino lovelive#top|talk]]) 00:06, 9 March 2022 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

@Betty Logan: If there's something I'd like to edit, but I'm not sure, I'll talk to you first. Further, I will not change color scheme recklessly. Since you proposed to reblock me, I am posting here. Zenkaino lovelive (talk) 00:30, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Zenkaino_lovelive&oldid=1076025293"