Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alessandro Hirata

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:20, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alessandro Hirata[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a non notable Brazilian professor (It does not seem to meet WP:PROF). The article was also deleted from Wikipedia in Portuguese, Wikipedia in Japanese and Wikipedia in Italian. The sources are either self published (Lattes is a self published currriculum) or have conflict with the professor (and some of them are offline). Nothing indicates notability. Bilhauano (talk) 19:14, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Bilhauano (talk) 19:14, 7 February 2016 (UTC) Bilhauano (talk) 19:14, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 19:27, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 19:27, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. His specialty (ancient law) appears to be a low-citation subject, but even so I can't find any of his publications that has more than low single-digit citations in Google scholar. That's not enough for WP:PROF#C1 and I don't see anything else. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:53, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete at best as this seems questionable for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 06:21, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per reasons above. Most online sources are self-published or very brief. giso6150 (talk) 21:45, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.