Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Stephen Gray
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 15:57, 11 March 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 15:57, 11 March 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wifione Message 19:38, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Mark Stephen Gray[edit]
- Mark Stephen Gray (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced BLP since its creation, and was PRODded to deletion in 2010 (was restored after deletion via request). Rationale was ""Spokesperson in support of the President of the European Commission" I'm sure he does his job well, but not notable". The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 02:34, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:43, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not keep-able in its current form. The only source provided doesn't work for me, so that would make it an unreferenced biography of a living person, which is generally considered a bad thing. Tigerboy1966 (talk) 10:55, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I added one very basic reference, but working as part of a press team does not amount to notability. AllyD (talk) 20:14, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.