Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Licefreee!

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 03:23, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Licefreee!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only source cited which is both reliable and not 404, is churnalism - obviously based on a press release. The article's tone is promotional, as you'd expect from a product that claims to be homeopathic but contains an active ingredient, albeit one of no known utility at this dilution in treating lice. Guy (Help!) 23:23, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as searches are finding nothing else better. SwisterTwister talk 05:42, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:42, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:42, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:42, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - if someone active on the article recovers some of the broken reliable sources, I'd reconsider. DaltonCastle (talk) 22:09, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.