Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marina Ovsyannikova

Marina Ovsyannikova

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO1E at this point. I salute her, but there is no indication that this minor event will have lasting implications. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:17, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:17, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:17, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment from the article creator. It is indeed difficult to see whether this is going to have lasting consequences, but I am sure today and tomorrow she will be on every single non-Russian media. Such things do not occur so often.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:19, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Given that we‘re dealing with real time events here and, in the event that this is confirmed to be true, exceptional bravery which will warrant a wikipedia entry, wouldn‘t it be worth to wait some time before deleting? 77.6.157.35 (talk) 20:24, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing will be deleted before a week has elapsed. Ymblanter (talk) 20:28, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I highly doubt Ovsyannikova will be relevant to the English wikipedia in a week from now, although I applaud her efforts. Réunion (stylised) - (talk to me) 20:26, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Putin troll. It is very relevant and will be, it is an act of courage. 86.127.145.123 (talk) 20:27, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I find it very funny I was called a Putin troll. Be kind. Just because I support this article for deletion does not mean I support Russia. Réunion (stylised) - (talk to me) 20:32, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No personal attacks, especially nonsense like that. Base your comments on Wikipedia policy. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:29, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This should NOT be deleted. I do hope Wikipedia isn't listening to Putins censorship? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:985:E7FF:1:9860:6F2B:144:5D5A

Not listening to censhorship when we talk about it here. More akin to pro-Ukraine propaganda, regardless, no trolling please. Oaktree b (talk) 20:32, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Would be better-served as a subsection in Russian propaganda or an article about the war itself Oaktree b (talk) 20:30, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep. She will either be the first step of a complete turnaround in the Russian press, or she will go to jail for a long time. Either outcome is important for the history books. Mlewan (talk) 20:37, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think we should wait until something happens on that front before making this point. Deleting an article doesn't necessarily mean it has to never be remade. Réunion (stylised) - (talk to me) 20:40, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

revolutions often happen in TV, for instance in 1989 the fact that communist controlled state TV flipped and started broadcasting facts about police violence towards students was an important factor, please do not delete 89.176.206.34 (talk) 20:41, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]