Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark S. Joshi
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 18:38, 16 March 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 21:45, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Mark S. Joshi[edit]
- Mark S. Joshi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article doesn't have any third-party sources, and may fail WP:V elektrikSHOOS 04:16, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A quick Google Scholar search seems to easily establish notability. True, there are no references, but that's not a legitimate reason to delete an article. SwarmTalk 08:57, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:29, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Joshi is very well known in mathematical finiance, and influential as a result of the popularity of his books. Notability is fine. But the article needs to be WP:V (which should be easy). (Disclaimer: I am biased perhaps. I have published with Joshi but not on math. finance)Billlion (talk) 05:41, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Impressive distribution of citations in GS so passes WP:Prof, also significant published work of a more popular nature. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:05, 16 July 2010 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.