Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brooke Berman
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 06:27, 17 March 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 06:27, 17 March 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy keep, nomination withdrawn and no other user supports deletion. Hut 8.5 10:34, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Brooke Berman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Pro removed by User:Calliopejen1, article is unsourced, authobographical and appears to not meet notability guidelines –– Jezhotwells (talk) 16:34, 4 July 2010 (UTC) Withdraw, all i found on a first search was the NYT artcile which is about flat hunting. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 18:15, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep Nominator didn't even bother to look for sources like NYT to prove notability. Just a waste of time. Dr. Blofeld White cat 16:51, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep. She does appear to be notable, but the article is a blatant autobiography. Erpert (let's talk about it) 16:53, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.