Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sudar123/Archive
Sudar123
- Sudar123 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
03 February 2012
[edit]- Suspected sockpuppets
- Roaring Leopard (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Pushing the same POV and tagging the Lies Agreed Upon article in the same manner. See this, this and this. Astronomyinertia (talk) 14:46, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Comments by other users
[edit]Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
Administrator note Per WP:DUCK I've blocked and tagged Roaring Leopard. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 01:27, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
- User:Roaring Leopard is not my sock. Please don't add tag that is my sock. Please get the help of CheckUser to confirm. That may be a sock from some other user.Sudar123 (talk) 02:36, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
14 February 2012
[edit]- Suspected sockpuppets
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Making the same edit as it was on the previous case. Abusing the IP, probably to evade 3RR. Astronomyinertia (talk) 18:12, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
Comments by other users
[edit]Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]- Administrator note IP blocked 1 week. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 04:00, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
- I am nothing to do with the above IP address, better go for a CheckUser.Sudar123 (talk) 08:43, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
09 December 2013
[edit]- Suspected sockpuppets
- Hillcountries (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- HudsonBreeze (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
As a scrutineer for ACE2013 I've found something suspicious related to these three accounts, since I don't want to overuse my temporary CU access I'd like some en.wiki CU to take care of a deeper investigation, thanks. Vituzzu (talk) 23:45, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Comments by other users
[edit]Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
Clerk endorsed - though I have no means to review the evidence, obviously. With that being said, both have edited stuff on Sri Lanka... Rschen7754 19:22, 10 December 2013 (UTC)- Given they edit the same articles and talk pages from the same geographic location and have cross-over on at least one IP, I would call the connection between Hillcountries (talk · contribs) and HudsonBreeze (talk · contribs) as
Likely socks of eachother. The behavioural evidence is particularly compelling (see for example the edit summaries here). Sudar123 (talk · contribs)'s most recent edit came from the same IP range as both named accounts here and they are a behavioural match as well (see for example this edit by HudsonBreeze and this one by Sudar123). It appears Likely to me that all three accounts belong to the same individual.--Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 18:57, 11 December 2013 (UTC) - Hillcountries and HudsonBreeze both blocked indef per checkuser findings. Sudar123 already blocked indef. Closing now. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:06, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
