Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orn Chanpolin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 03:40, 19 March 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 01:08, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orn Chanpolin[edit]

Orn Chanpolin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD by IP on the grounds that he is a professional footballer. However, this is not valid grounds for notability, the original concerns still stand: player fails NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 08:07, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Fenix down (talk) 08:08, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Yellow Dingo (talk) 08:11, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Yellow Dingo (talk) 08:11, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. Yellow Dingo (talk) 08:11, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.