Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mafia Magazine (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 04:08, 19 March 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  10:21, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mafia Magazine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a magazine which has no reliable sources nor can I find any further claims to notability. This fails WP:GNG and I cannot find anything to help support the lower guide of WP:NMEDIA McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 14:39, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 14:40, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 14:40, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 14:40, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:32, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:32, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I can't find a single secondary source to even verify that this magazine exists, much less that it's notable. This seems like a no-brainer. Article claims it's been around since 2004; if that's true, the utter absence of coverage by any sources seems to indicate it's never going to be notable. For all we know, the entire magazine is online only; there's no sources online that I found that could confirm any of the claims made in the article about the print edition, such as circulation of 50,000, the availability on east and west coasts, and even its very existence - that info could easily all be made up out of thin air. Rockypedia (talk) 16:53, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.