Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Korean maritime border incidents (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Korean maritime border incidents

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article as it now stands duplicates material in List of border incidents involving North Korea, the Northern Limit Line, and the main articles for the various incidents described on the page. It has no reason to exist. Jack Upland (talk) 01:33, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator: I will proceed instead with a merge proposal.--Jack Upland (talk) 01:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Content from this article is mostly worth saving, but it is indeed a case of some redundant forking. I assume this is primarily a result of bad writing. WP:REDUNDANTFORK All of the articles are badly written and messy. The list is way too verbose for instance. However, I would Keep this article per Zorgon's and Xyl 54's arguments from the previous nomination. The NLL article is already pretty long. This should have been a merge proposal in my opinion. WP:ATD-M WP:MERGEINIT AfD is not for deleting merely bad articles. Ceosad (talk) 19:14, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The reason why I didn't propose a merge is that the content is already duplicated. Deletion seemed simpler.--Jack Upland (talk) 01:39, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:08, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:33, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:12, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.