Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jéssica Ibarra

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 04:39, 19 March 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Miss Venezuela 2010. (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 04:22, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jéssica Ibarra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ibarra won a state level Miss Venezuela competition. Like the state level winners of Miss America competitions, I see no reason to think that Ibarra is notable, and nothing beyond that state level win to make Ibarra notable. John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:55, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:49, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:49, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of South America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:49, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Venezuela-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:19, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep for now. Discussion about notability guidelines has already started on the Talk page for the Beauty Pageant project. No harm will be done by closing this nomination as "keep" and letting the project-level discussion take its course. NewYorkActuary (talk) 16:26, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I think yes redirect, but then again all references appear to be dead links. Not sure. I tried different ways of searching the subject and nothing comes up. I can correct my vote if shown otherwise. FairlySavvy (talk) 16:52, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jujutacular (talk) 02:35, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.