Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex M.O.R.P.H.
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:00, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
- Alex M.O.R.P.H. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article mostly relies on user-generated sources such as Discogs to support its content, going against WP:USERG. Hakken (talk) 09:53, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Mark the trainDiscuss 09:58, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Mark the trainDiscuss 09:58, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete a non-notable DJ.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:35, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. Passes WP:GNG, received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject – [1][2][3][4][5][6]. — Zawl 11:12, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 02:20, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 02:20, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:24, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:24, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per the significant coverage given above by Zawl.--Pontificalibus (talk) 06:34, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per ZAWL, the subject has significant coverage in the news, clearly passed WP:GNG. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:57, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.