Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Melen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 18:48, 19 March 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:43, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Melen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is created by an SPA whose sole purpose on Wikipedia is to highlight Mr. Melen's business achievements. The sourcing is a problem, with a glut of primary source citations. At the very least, a redirect to the (barely) acceptable T35 Hosting article makes sense. A standalone article on Mr. Melen, however, smells of WP:COI. And Adoil Descended (talk) 03:11, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 12:14, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 12:14, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:29, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:25, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:25, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.