Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nawab Muhammad Dilawar Khanji

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Muhammad Dilawar Khanji. The consensus finds that this article is a duplicate of Muhammad Dilawar Khanji. The discussion is closed without prejudice to nominating Muhammad Dilawar Khanji for deletion on notability or other grounds. (non-admin closure) Mz7 (talk) 02:28, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nawab Muhammad Dilawar Khanji

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~This Dilawar Khanji may not have notability The Avengers 15:21, 7 December 2015 (UTC)~~ Reverted as per WP:BANREVERT. 03:53, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate of Muhammad Dilawar Khanji; one of the two articles has the birthdate wrong, and I'm betting on this one. Speedily redirect since there appears to be nothing worth merging. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 15:37, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:16, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:49, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:49, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:49, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:49, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect - the photograph is the only thing that appears to be worth merging. --lTopGunl (talk) 16:47, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.