Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serene Oasis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:42, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Serene Oasis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) (Chinese)

I originally reviewed the article tentatively, citing possible notability problems, hoping it would improve. Unfortunately, few WP:RSes have been added to the article, and as it is the only sources cited are those published by the organization itself. This definitely fails the WP:notability standard for companies and organizations. Also, the article is currently written as an advertisement for the location, with most attention paid to the struggles the company has had to establish itself in Hong Kong. For now, I think it's best if this article gets deleted via AfD, as no sources seem to be accruing in WP:RS spaces. Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 17:27, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 17:27, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 17:29, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 17:29, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 23:23, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There are plenty of references out there in reliable sources, it's just that they're all in Chinese. I've added a template above for reference. Philg88 ^♦talk 12:16, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:37, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.