Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TamannaC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:31, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

TamannaC

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

promotional nonsense. Supported by dodgy references Rathfelder (talk) 22:30, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There's a lot going on here, including wp:fringe. Although, perhaps if my past life were karmic-ly healed, I'd be more sympathetic. No reliable sources, and openly promotional. LaMona (talk) 21:52, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:40, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable individual.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:41, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Despite the Economic Times piece on women claiming to have special healing powers and coverage of the two actors present at her book launch (apparently "elated" to be part of the event, no less), I am not seeing reliable evidence of notability. If the launch-publicity coverage was to be considered as substantial (contrary to my opinion), then there is a WP:TNT consideration, as the vast majority of the article is non-encyclopaedic. AllyD (talk) 08:31, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:54, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:54, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:54, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I did run a couple of searches, but Nom pegs it. Nice work spotting and bringing this hers.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:31, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- non notable subject. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:18, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.