Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SaveTheInternet.in

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to TRAI. Kurykh (talk) 01:41, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SaveTheInternet.in

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just an advertisement with hardly any sources talking about the website only social media links mention it. Most contributions have been made by SPAs who edited no other articles.[1][2] D4iNa4 (talk) 14:50, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:26, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:26, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DGG ( talk ) 04:31, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ unfair to have page on the website that is significantly unpopular and contains no mention in reliable sources. Those social networking pages are not notable either that have mentioned the website. Rzvas (talk) 08:38, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the topic has received some coverage in reliable sources. See this article from Firstpost and this article from The Economic Times for starters. I have not researched the overall notability of lack thereof of the topic at this time to post an !vote, but relisting the discussion. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That's why I change vote to redirect to TRAI. Rzvas (talk) 10:38, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect. Doesn't seem sufficiently notable for retention and article is massively puffed up. Redirect to TRAI. Inlinetext (talk) 10:59, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.