Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Massriot
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:41, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
- Massriot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A rather promotional article, not citing any sources, and not in English. The subject may be suitable for a suitable article, but this is not that article. (Note: The creator of the article removed deletion proposal (PROD), without giving any reason for doing so.) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:55, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 14:37, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Slovakia-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 14:37, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as none of this is comprehensible and imaginable for better notability, I would've likely PRODed unless this can actually be improved. SwisterTwister talk 21:10, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete The article creator just copypasted the original article and then ended his Wikipedia career there. I don't think it'll be translated in years if it's kept. Then add on top of that all of the other mentioned problems. --Mr. Magoo (talk) 17:36, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- In addition it seems like our Slovakian friends may have deleted their version of the Massriot article because it only appears as a red link. --Mr. Magoo (talk) 17:39, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.