Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cara&Co

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 03:10, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cara&Co

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blatantly promotional - violates WP:Promo. Rogermx (talk) 21:06, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:35, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Promotional material should be removed, but the subject is notable, with significant coverage in secondary sources. See here, here, here, and here. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:12, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:12, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Cwmhiraeth: Perhaps it's a mistake on my end, but I only actually see Cara & Co mentioned in the first link you've posted, and even then it's such a passing mention as to not really be a reference at all. Unless you can perhaps help me understand the other 3 links then it's a Delete from me. Pishcal (talk) 18:41, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Pishcal: The links I give say things like "The most famous stores are ... and Cara&Co." and "The Cara&Co shop (facing page) is one of the new retail outlets." and "Pour les fous de shopping, le magasin Cara&Co vous propose les dernieres tendances des designers Belge, Anglais et Australien." and one in Russian that mentions Cara & Co in the fourth paragraph. In essence they are mentioning Cara&Co as an important retail outlet in Moscow, ie. a notable shop, like M&S in Britain or TKMax. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:25, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

But are these sources anything more than passing mentions, anything significant enough to deem the store notable and meet gng? I apologize for not being able to read the sources, but from what you say it doesn't seem that way to me. Pishcal (talk) 19:48, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:35, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:35, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, WP:NOTPROMOTION. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:36, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:PROMO with a good doze of WP:TNT. Not suitable for inclusion at all. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:50, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.