Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shevonne Durkin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:48, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shevonne Durkin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

To be fair the first reason that I thought of nominating this article for deletion was that when I came across it there was one source, IMDb, which does not meet the guidelines for reliable sources of Wikipedia. Thought of another way, IMDb tries to be an undifferentiated total directory of everyone who has every appeared in a professionally made film, and that may be putting their inclusion criteria more tightly than they are meant to be, whereas Wikipedia has inclusion criteria far more stringent than "has appeared in a film somewhere". I did do a search and found another source, but I highly doubt it would pass muster as a reliable source, and saying it provides indepth coverage of Durkin would be a bit much. Having reviewed the list of Durkin's appearances, they consist of one episode appearances in TV shows or bit parts in marginally notable movies like Tammy and the T-Rex. The one exception is her role in Leprechaun 2. However our guidelines for actors say we need two significant roles, not just one. John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:38, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The two mentions of her on high bean are just passing mentions in reviews of the film Leprechaun 2 with no significant statements about her role there.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:39, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:48, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:48, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:17, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nominator; subject does not have much indepth coverage, and does not meet WP:NACTOR. (Yes, I'm supporting a JPL nomination for deletion. This is not one of the signs of the apocalypse.) --GRuban (talk) 18:47, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom - fails NACTOR & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 21:13, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.