Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aleksei Terentjev

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Go Phightins! 01:29, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Aleksei Terentjev

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This player completely fails to meet WP:GNG and fails to meet WP:NHOCKEY, similar to the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jaanus_Sorokin --Nug (talk) 18:32, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Nug (talk) 18:32, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nominator. --Nug (talk) 18:34, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Estonia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:26, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:26, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Seems to fail all relevant notability guidelines. --Sander Säde 06:27, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Fails GNG. Reso lute 13:35, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Meets criteria #6 of WP:NHOCKEY “Played on a senior national team (such as at the Olympic Games or World Championship).” Member of the Estonia men's national ice hockey team from 1996 to 2009[1]. Dolovis (talk) 00:49, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Surely you have multiple non-trivial, independent sources sufficient to demonstrate a GNG pass such as to justify this keep vote? Reso lute 13:12, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Like the other Afd linked, while he meets NHOCKEY he still fails GNG which is the ultimate decider. There is no coverage of this individual to be found. -DJSasso (talk) 12:18, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
We both agree that he is to be presumed notable per NHOCKEY until proven otherwise. Presumably GNG can be demonstrated with the help of Estonian sources, which I am not able to search due to the language barrier. Have you tried looking for Estonian sources? Dolovis (talk) 17:26, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yes actually I have. And NHOCKEY isn't presumed notable until proven otherwise, you should read it. Its actually notable until questioned. Being that the nom is a very vigorous defender of Estonian articles, I find it highly unlikely they didn't also look at Estonian sources. -DJSasso (talk) 00:15, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.