Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Billboard number-one country songs of 2021/archive1
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by FACBot (talk | contribs) at 00:25, 23 March 2022 (List of Billboard number-one country songs of 2021 promoted to Featured List). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 23 March 2022 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of Billboard number-one country songs of 2021 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk), DanTheMusicMan2 (talk) 08:31, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
With 2021 out of the way, it's time to nominate this list ready to (hopefully) add it to the Featured Topic. This time round, I have added DanTheMusicMan2 as a co-nom, as he did the legwork of adding each week's number ones as they were announced. Hope that's OK, Dan! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:31, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Image review
[edit]- Passes my image review, though if you could replace File:191125 Taylor Swift at the 2019 American Music Awards (cropped).png with her any other image, would be better. Licence wise, it is fine (CC licences are non-revocable), but the fact that Cosmopolitan UK changed their video description to make licencing a bit more restrictive looks a bit ... Regardless, we have a lot of images in Commons:Category:Taylor Swift in 2019. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 09:52, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Changed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:00, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Source review
[edit]- Passes my source review as well! On first read, I got nothing that could be an issue with the sources. On second read, the only thing I could get was that you can change the link target of Vulture in Ref#6 from
[[New York (magazine)|Vulture]]
to[[Vulture (magazine)|Vulture]]
(a redirect page) just so that if redirects to a particular section. Ref#12 to Ref#113 — all good, as always! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:11, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]- Changed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:16, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Dank
[edit]- Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
- Checking the FLC criteria:
- 1. The prose and the table coding seem fine. I checked sorting on all sortable columns and sampled the links in the table.
- 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
- 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
- 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present.
- 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
- 4. It is navigable.
- 5. It meets style requirements. At a glance, the images seem fine.
- 6. It is stable.
- Support. Well done. - Dank (push to talk) 03:15, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from TRM
[edit]- I thought we'd gotten into the mindset of linking "chart" in these articles?
- "began being published" this seems awkward, could "began publication" or ", published since ..." work?
- "number one on the Country Airplay chart, having previously been number one for the chart dated December 19, 2020,[2] while "I Hope" by Gabby Barrett held the number one " -> "number one" used thrice in a single sentence...!
- In fact "number one" appears 17 times in the lead, and yes I know it's about number ones, but you could use alternatives to mix it up a little?
- "give former American Idol contestant" we sometimes get told which season they were from for context.
- I don't seem to be able to access ref 1 without a subscription.
That's all I have. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 15:06, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @The Rambling Man: - all address, I think. And can I say how good it is to see you back :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:07, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Same here, welcome back. - Dank (push to talk) 01:54, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Support my primary concerns addressed. And thank you both for your kind words. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 20:35, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by FrB.TG
[edit]- "but went back to the peak position" - returned to.
- All sources are properly formatted and reliable.
Pretty solid list; just one minor tweak suggestion above. Support either way. FrB.TG (talk) 18:49, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Promoting.
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.