Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Dallman (2nd nomination)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 01:47, 24 March 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 01:47, 24 March 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Hersfold (t/a/c) 18:24, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Matthew Dallman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Player fails WP:ATHLETE as he has never played in a fully-professional league - his appearances to date have been in the semi-pro USL Premier Development League and Oberliga Nordrhein-Westfalen. GiantSnowman 11:53, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. GiantSnowman 11:53, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - the previous AfD was about a different person (a musician) so is not directly relevant. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 12:04, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:ATHLETE - no professional appearances, no notability. --Angelo (talk) 19:19, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Per nom. Hubschrauber729 (talk) 20:59, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Per nom Nothing of real note. Trials are non notable unless they lead to something and his haven't. Recreate if and when. ps. nicely written for a non-notable, perhaps author(s) would like to research and write up his grandfather if Portsmouth claim is correct.--ClubOranjeT 07:13, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.