User talk:Daemonic Kangaroo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

I have been editing on Wikipedia for nearly ten years and during that time have met some really obnoxious people - rude, aggressive, self-opinionated and think that their view and only their view is correct. I wish to have nothing more to do with it. I'm out for good. -- Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 05:09, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Please reconsider[edit]

Wikipedia is indeed full of people who know they're right, god knows I'm one of them. But please don't let a bad encounter drive you away for good. Wikipedia needs editors like you who keep away from confrontation and get on with creating and maintaining quality content.

Whatever you decide, all the best with the rest of your life, and genuine thanks for what you've done here. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 08:40, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Regardless of our recent altercation, I have to agree with Struway. It may not have seemed like it to you, but I was trying to have a constructive discussion with you, so I hope you'll come back and engage with us once again. – PeeJay 11:07, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Hope you come back, buddy. Andre666 (talk) 12:28, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Yeah, come back, you are a credit to the project.--EchetusXe 16:32, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
I'm going to echo all of the above, you are a valued member of not just FOOTY but also the Project as a whole. Please re-consider. GiantSnowman 16:41, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Yes, come on fellow, don't let the rudies let you down! Putting the Project aside to do something else for a short while seems a healthy step to me after the annoyances, but then take a look at your non-neglegible (and appreciated) additional value as a Wikipedia-authority. Kareldorado (talk) 15:32, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Wish you nothing but the best, i'm leaving also for good after the World Cup. Ironically, my list of "People whom i have encountered who are full of it" also includes ME, so you see it's not fun anymore. You take care, hopefully your next visit to my country will be even more pleasant than the last one.

Kind(est) regards --AL (talk) 22:31, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for everything you've done for the project. I do hope you reconsider and come back soon. Best wishes, WaggersTALK 10:57, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

You're invited[edit]

Hi Daemonic Kangaroo, you're invited to this meetup :-) -- Marek.69 talk 02:49, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Hagiology Publishing listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]


An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hagiology Publishing. Since you had some involvement with the Hagiology Publishing redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. – PeeJay 00:41, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Nomination of Mike Osman for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mike Osman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Osman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —JAaron95 Talk 08:15, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (Connah's Quay & Shotton F.C.) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Connah's Quay & Shotton F.C., Daemonic Kangaroo!

Wikipedia editor Scope creep just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Cool Winston!.

To reply, leave a comment on Scope creep's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Proposed deletion of John D Wood & Co.[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article John D Wood & Co. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Pure promotion.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bishonen | talk 09:10, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)