Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inetscreen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:23, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Inetscreen

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains^(talk) 02:06, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 02:24, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The entire article has been cited with reliable sources including The New Indian Express, Malayala Manorama, Deshabhimani etc. 2405:204:5505:B9E:C183:8D:226A:3DA1 (talk) 05:10, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete - this falls under advertising. Is non-notable, needs to be nuked! Skirts89 (talk) 17:15, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails GNG as per nom Spiderone 19:16, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- There is no puffery involved. The entire article is factual and has been cited with reliable sourcesincluding The New Indian Express, Malayala Manorama, Deshabhimani. etc2406:7400:58:FC35:D5A8:80AB:A0D7:CB71 (talk) 11:29, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - The discussion hasn't gone forward since 22 November 2018. I think it is time to close the deletion entry. As mentioned above, the entire article is cited with reliable sources including major publications.103.5.135.9 (talk) 22:55, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    - Let's get some more opinions in here. The article is clearly promotional and mentions in major publications do not guarantee notability. Skirts89 (talk) 03:41, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:22, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - this is a case of WP:TOOSOON as the service has not come out yet. Kirbanzo (talk) 19:24, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.