Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Penny
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 20:05, 29 March 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 20:05, 29 March 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 07:47, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Brian Penny (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable blogger. Only mention in RS is this Fox Business piece, which does not meet the requirements at WP:PEOPLE The Interior (Talk) 01:46, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I am unable to find sources anywhere which would allow Brian meet notability guidelines. Clovis Sangrail (talk) 01:55, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- - According to the talk page of the article, this page is an autobiography. Clovis Sangrail (talk) 05:49, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There's no evidence for notability here. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:18, 20 October 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:13, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - the references only briefly mention the subject of the article, if at all; for example, the CNN piece doesn't even mention him. Bearian (talk) 22:43, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.