Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank McGowan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Stutter Bunny. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:06, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Frank McGowan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are no reliable sources here, and there are a million Frank McGowan's in Scotland. Just because someone is in a notable band doesn't make them, themselves notable. It appears his bands are more notable than he - and him appearing on a few TV programs also doesn't make him notable.

For me, fails WP:GNG but perhaps I just lost steam researching him. SarahStierch (talk) 20:12, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSpecialUser ^TSU 13:30, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 10:24, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:36, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect to Stutter Bunny with whom he has sourcability (but not enough for an independent article on him). The BAFTA Awards nomination[1] might be indicative of growing notability, but his career in film minimal enough to fail WP:ENT and WP:FILMMAKER.[2] Return only if and when his sourcable notablity meets inclusion criteria and, if that happens, the article will have to be purged of its promotional tone. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 05:50, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.