Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demetrice Jackson
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 14:46, 2 April 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 09:54, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Demetrice Jackson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability. No sign of meeting WP:NACTOR. Credits appear to be bit parts and extra work. Nat Gertler (talk) 16:47, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:35, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:35, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:35, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete While playing walkers on The Walking Dead is definitely cool, I see only bit parts and uncredited roles, and thus nothing to suggest notability at this time.HillbillyGoat (talk) 21:51, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- HillbillyGoat (talk · contribs) has only contributed to the article(s) under discussion for deletion and AFD. Binksternet (talk) 15:29, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I think this might be a truly marginal case, a charcter actor with lots of small parts, but those roles are in cult films and TV. No sure whether we should keep or delete. Bearian (talk) 19:25, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 19:00, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Neither the quality nor the quantity of his roles come close. Zero media notice. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:30, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.