Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashif Shaikh

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Articles for deletion

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 183.82.108.172 (talk) at 22:28, 5 April 2022 (Ashif Shaikh). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Ashif Shaikh

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Ashif Shaikh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

References are too weak and the article is too big without proper citations. @@@XyX talk 22:27, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I closed this AFD discussion as a Soft Delete but later noticed the very low edit count of the two participants. So, I restored the article and am relisting this AFD, in the hope of getting editors with more experience reviewing articles to participate in this discussion and evaluation of this article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:32, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete lacking reliable sources to meet WP:BIO. Note that quite a bit of text is uncited. LibStar (talk) 01:18, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete fails WP:GNG lacks indepth references.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:49, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong keep - plenty of references in news and books; some just passing, others more in depth. Springnuts (talk) 22:30, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Hello User:Springnuts, I am the nominator of this AFD can you provided the reference of the article you said has in depth coverage or you can update the article so that we can see @@@XyX talk 22:44, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not a third relist, just relisting for Bijoy2020 as their recent relist didn't take effect except for leaving the note above. Consider this the second relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:57, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: Here’s one from news: [[1]]

But the nomination is odd: no valid reason for deletion is given - though problems with the article are alleged. Did you try to improve/clean up the article? Springnuts (talk) 23:03, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Springnuts: Per The Logical Indian source you provided I personally think Mr. Ashif Shaikh in that article is completely different one. Correct me if I'm wrong? On Googling I found an Indian actor Aasif Sheikh I personally can't find any proper sources about this person, but you are very old and experienced editor finding to vote this article as Strong Keep I would love to takedown this nomination if you improve this article, I hope it won't take much time as you already have some good indepth references as you said earlier. @@@XyX talk 23:18, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Bijoy2020:It appears you are wrong. Did you read the reference? Line 3: "Mr Ashif Shaikh, founder of the Jan Sahas Organisation". The article, line 1: "founder-director of the community and survivor focused non-profit organisation Jan Sahas". Friendly regards,Springnuts (talk) 12:45, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well with respect it’s for you to consider alternatives to deletion (such as cleanup or tagging etc) WP:BEFORE nominating. Springnuts (talk) 04:40, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Springnuts: Not found any valid reason for tagging any tag like cleanup or something; I found less(no) WP:RS or any borderline to consider it for any other tags, I was thinking to tag WP:PROD but later considered to start an AFD. @@@XyX talk 05:06, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have added the "Autobiography cleanup" tag - that's a start. I can't give any more time to this, but the closing editor will need to decide whether WP:TNT is justified. In my opinion it is not, but there we go. That's why we have these discussions and seek consensus. All good wishes, Springnuts (talk) 12:57, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom lacking reliable sources to meet WP:BIO.183.82.108.172 (talk) 22:28, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ashif_Shaikh&oldid=1081198537"