Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaio Philipe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of Notability according to the references which lacks WP:SIGCOV. fails WP:GNG. Jeni Wolf (talk) 05:53, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, and Brazil. Jeni Wolf (talk) 05:53, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Probable UPE, not seeing any SIGCOV from independent sources.-KH-1 (talk) 09:29, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is a business personality in Brazil and Latin America 75.104.94.113 (talk) 13:33, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and improve. This is a business personality with several references 75.104.94.113 (talk) 13:58, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it. Further references added for notability. The person is notable as he has some credible references Sarah Freedmen (talk) 15:28, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Significant coverage BBC, Washington post, Bloomberg, from reliable sources 75.104.94.113 (talk) 15:47, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The obvious socks above (really, do better, guys!) don't sway me and the lack of RS covering him indicate he is no more than a guy with a job who can get PR style write ups. This is nothing more than vanity spam. CUPIDICAE💕 18:01, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing notable found. He's featured on a web page for TV5 Monde discussing an NFT he created, but it's only in passing he's mentioned. Most are mentions of his name in an article, nothing featuring him alone. Vanity spam. Oaktree b (talk) 19:04, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep it, independent sources and notable. User above mentioned TV5 Monde, this reference is not on the source. 24.234.111.66 (talk) 19:33, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the references are there, unsure why the disputes if they are credible sources it seems tied up with the person role. Maria sharpov je (talk) 19:21, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]