Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Starmark
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 21:06, 23 April 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 21:06, 23 April 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Notability is there given sourcing. (non-admin closure) treelo radda 00:16, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Starmark (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
The Corporation in question does not achieve standards required for notability as specified in Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) Tigerassault (talk) 16:12, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Please see Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion debates especially WP:JUSTAPOLICY. You didn't specify how it failed to meet the criteria. - Mgm|(talk) 21:41, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I think it would be reasonable to imply that the nominator meant that the company has not been the subject of significant coverage in secondary sources reliable and independent of the subject. The guidelines are pretty straightforward. --Paul_012 (talk) 09:58, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The company is mentioned in at least two news articles found via Google News Search,[1][2] one of which describes the company as "the second largest furniture manufacturer in Thailand".[3] --Paul_012 (talk) 09:58, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Being the second largest furniture manufacturer in a country the size of Thailand sounds pretty notable, and the sources found by Paul confirm this. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:46, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep sources shown by Paul_012 show notability; it would be nice if the article was referenced with a few of them though. Arsenikk (talk) 20:37, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.