Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darrel Reid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Per WP:NPASR. (non-admin closure) —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:05, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Darrel Reid

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a political strategist. While a deputy chief of staff in the PMO could certainly be eligible for a Wikipedia article if the volume of sourcing were strong enough to satisfy WP:GNG, it's not a position that confers an automatic entitlement to a Wikipedia article just because the person exists — but of the four sources here, three of them just namecheck his existence rather than being coverage of him, and the fourth is a primary source. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 16:36, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 19:44, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 19:44, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:43, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (T) 03:56, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – A quick google search provides a fair amount of coverage from Reid's tenure as president of Focus on the Family Canada, definitely more than a namecheck. Graham (talk) 03:31, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.