Jump to content

User talk:IndaneLove

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by IndaneLove (talk | contribs) at 06:44, 5 May 2022. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, IndaneLove, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Atlantic306 (talk) 09:51, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kruti Mahesh (choreographer) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kruti Mahesh (choreographer), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CUPIDICAE💕 19:17, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

were you planning to update the article? you had some good arguments, but we needed the other issues sorted out first Oaktree b (talk) 20:04, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Oaktree b Administrator moved this article to draftspace even he stated that Mahesh is probably notable. Kruti is notable according to her reliable sources and her notable awards. So why article is not suitable for mainspace?. An article Aakanksha Sareen i created recently also deleted but i agree Aakanksha is probably non notable and i have no objection with the administrator’s decision but in the case of kruti i am not agree with the decision. By the way what are the issues we needed to sort out?

IndaneLove (talk) 06:40, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

and yes i wanted to update the article with the sources suggested by Beccaynr. IndaneLove (talk) 06:44, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shashie Verma for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shashie Verma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shashie Verma (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hatchens (talk) 07:06, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sambhav Jain for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sambhav Jain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sambhav Jain until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hatchens (talk) 07:07, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aakanksha Sareen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aakanksha Sareen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aakanksha Sareen (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hatchens (talk) 07:08, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pushpdeep Bhardwaj for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pushpdeep Bhardwaj is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pushpdeep Bhardwaj until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hatchens (talk) 07:13, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sudhanshu Rai for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sudhanshu Rai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sudhanshu Rai until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hatchens (talk) 07:16, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Detective Boomrah for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Detective Boomrah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Detective Boomrah until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hatchens (talk) 07:20, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kruti Mahesh (choreographer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kruti Mahesh (choreographer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kruti Mahesh (choreographer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hatchens (talk) 08:25, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ranjish He Sahi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ranjish He Sahi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ranjish He Sahi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hatchens (talk) 09:01, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SPI investigation

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/IndaneLove. Thank you.. -Hatchens (talk) 02:41, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Information icon

Hello IndaneLove. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Kruti Mahesh (choreographer), gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:IndaneLove. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=IndaneLove|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 06:59, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Timtrent No, with the grace of god i am not under any compulsion that i have to earn money from Wikipedia so this is false allegation.

IndaneLove (talk) 05:35, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your answer is not direct. Please give a direct answer. It is not an allegation, it is a question, no more and no less.
Wikipedia requires a simple yes or no answer, please 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 20:16, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Timtrent My direct answer is no. IndaneLove (talk) 09:30, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the clarity. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 19:27, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kruti Mahesh (choreographer) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kruti Mahesh (choreographer), is not suitable as written to remain published. I cannot require you to let a neutral editor work on it, but you are required to have an independent editor accept it before you move it back.