Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julia McIlvaine
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 19:21, 5 May 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Tone 11:16, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Julia McIlvaine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No WP:RS cited, fails WP:N. Delete. Basket of Puppies 01:07, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete (IMHO) the bigger issue is with WP:V. A recurring voice credit on a Nickelodeon cartoon along with some major live appearances on several notable TV shows, would imply at least some notability - but per the nom, there are no reliable sources and I wasn't able to find any. 2 says you, says two 02:01, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:09, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Enough references.--Apollo789 (talk) 20:41, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep While disgreeing with Apollo789 about the current sourcing, it seems that a search finds plenty of available sources to address any concerns toward WP:V. The nom noted these were missing, but surmountable issues should be addressed through regular editing, not deletion. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 00:21, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.