What on earth made you decide to replace one template with another? The previous template, before your edits, was small and not particularly intrusive - now it's a monster. I really think you should have made a new template, or started a discussion before screwing up something that is used on people's user pages. Janizary23:33, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I did make this change because the old format was unneeded, it was just an image tag, so if it where kept like that, it had to go to TfD. →AzaToth10:47, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It was not just an image tag, it made it easy for lots of people to send out this award, - [[Image:{{{image}}}|left|frame|{{{text}}} <small>[[Wikipedia:Kindness Campaign|(KC)]]</small>]] is a moutful of text for some people to type in, had this just been [[Image:{{{image}}}]] I would agree with you, but it also contains links and formating. This is not worth starting an edit war over, but I know what brought me to this page is that I noticed the display of awards people gave to me was no longer neatly arraged on my userpage, so this seems to be at least somewhat disruptive, (guess the award presenters should have subst:'d them, but again thats more syntax to hand out a gift). xaosfluxTalk/CVU16:54, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The problem with this format is that it usually don't fit so well on a talk-page, for example blablabla have a habit to float to much; →AzaToth18:03, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
why was this option removed? It's still in the description, but it doesn't work - the images come out full size. It'd be nice to have back.. -Goldom(t)(Review)17:25, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
