Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crofton Cougars ARLFC
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 20:11, 19 May 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 15:38, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Crofton Cougars ARLFC[edit]
- Crofton Cougars ARLFC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails inclusion criteria - an amateur team and a second division of amateur teams team - no inherent notability there. In terms of fulfilling WP:ORG as it relates to non-profits I find no evidence of activity on the national or international scale, and no coverage outside the standardised stories you'd expect from a local paper. Ironholds (talk) 20:50, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:30, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:31, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per the sixth word of the article. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 11:34, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:30, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete lacks significant coverage, hence not verifiable Chzz ► 05:35, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. As an amateur team, huge referencing would be necessary to prove notability. It doesn't look like there is any. And no, being geographically close to relevant, professional teams does not make this side notable. McMarcoP (talk) 07:59, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.