Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruth Bennett

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:33, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ruth Bennett[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. A WP:BEFORE search on multiple search engines turned up routine campaign coverage and trivial mentions of the subject, no significant coverage in reliable independent sources. Sal2100 (talk) 18:55, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women, Sexuality and gender, and Washington. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:04, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Libertarianism-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:04, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to a lack of RS that aren't routine election coverage. I looked for sources using Google News and the Wikipedia Library and couldn't find anything in-depth since her last run for major office. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:38, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete being a functionary for a party at a US state level is not even clear grounds for inclusion if the party actually elects people to office. For a party that gets no candidates in the legislature the threshold for inclusion is very good sources that provide indepth details on the person, which is totally lacking here.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:42, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:POLOUTCOMES. State-level party executives are not automatically notable, even for major parties. Best, GPL93 (talk) 16:44, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.