User talk:Berry stark
May 2022
Hello, I'm Ab207. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Prashanth Neel, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Don't remove reliably sourced content without discussion, and don't add new information without sources -- Ab207 (talk) 14:35, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi Berry stark! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Prashanth Neel several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Prashanth Neel, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war.
Please don't add self-publised sources like Tamil funda and Answeregi etc, see WP:ICTFFAQ. Ab207 (talk) 16:30, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Berry_stark reported by User:Ab207 (Result: ). Thank you. Ab207 (talk) 17:17, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Prashanth Neel shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Arjayay (talk) 17:49, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
May 2022 - again
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Prashanth Neel, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Raghu Veera Reddy, you may be blocked from editing.
Please stop deleting reliably sourced information and adding unreliably sourced claims - Arjayay (talk) 17:53, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy, as you did with this edit to Prashanth Neel. ~RAM (talk) 04:50, 26 May 2022 (UTC)