Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Beard (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:53, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Beard

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage and only one major role The sources in the 2012 AfD did not show notability - interviews, a three sentence article about a crime, links to two Google searches, IMDb profile, etc. He did appear in all 18 episodes of a reality series, but it is questionable if it's a significant role and it certainly isn't acting. SL93 (talk) 22:27, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 22:33, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the sourcing is not substnatial, and being an actor in a soap opera who has also been in reality shows is not a default sign of notability. IMDb is not reliable and his own website is neither secondary nor indepedent. Wikipedia is to be built on what reliable secondary sources have said about the subject, when we have none we can say nothing and thus should have no article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:43, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lacks RS to establish GNG. Megtetg34 (talk) 06:49, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.