Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Axial Higgs boson

Axial Higgs boson

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is just bad PR from one not so significant paper that trolled for publicity. Peter Woit explains this better than I: [1]. Anyway, just because someone publishes an abstract with a buzzword no one else uses is not a reason for a Wikipedia article. No SIGCOV here. Mvqr (talk) 16:02, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Mvqr (talk) 16:02, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete We need fewer articles based on churnalism, not more. A new kind of excitation in a condensed-matter system might be interesting, but given that the paper announcing it was published yesterday, we have nothing to write about: there simply aren't reliable, independent, secondary sources upon which we could build an article. XOR'easter (talk) 16:09, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Too recent. A sensible entry, based on the Woit blog entry and one of the EurekAlert releases, has been added at 2022 in science. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 16:21, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and LaundryPizza03, though it might be worth considering a redirect to Quantum computing? Sleddog116 (talk) 19:27, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]