User talk:Z.E.R.O.
User:Meteoroid/mainpage/top User:Meteoroid/header
Sorry!
Sorry Meteoroid! A while back I re-create my account for my new e-mail address and you violate me a Sock Puppetry by User:Jiggy Q93. A while back I forgot configuring at "my preferences to change my e-mail address. I'm very sorry I forgot to do this -- but I clicked it then I changed my e-mail address. Very sorry... ~ Jigs41793 Talk/contribs 10:35, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
- OK, I using an alternate account. Jigs41793 Talk/contribs 10:57, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
- You may use an alternate account as long as you have the User Alternate Acct userbox. Meteoroid 03:03, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Gah!
Archiving is bad enough, but that bot noxiously removes things that should be kept! 68.39.174.238 00:55, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Many thanks for moving my userpage back from Intoxicated asshole, didn't even notice it! God knows what I'd done to User:TheCars4Life to annoy him so much! Oh well, thanks to you he's indef blocked now! cheers again RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 17:15, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Who are you? Meteoroid 03:16, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- See this, thanks again RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 17:45, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Hello, Meteoroid! I noticed you recently added a warning to this page. To me, this seems a bit unnecessary because in the past four months, only three users have uploaded new versions of the image, all of which were for technical reasons, and none of which (to my knowledge) have caused any altercations or revert wars. Furthermore, this message might discourage users from uploading a new version of the image, which is needed as explained by the tag on that page. I would appreciate your thoughts on this matter. Thanks, Dar-Ape 04:50, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- Please see 3RR to see why I posted the warning message on some images. Thank you. Meteoroid 04:53, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- Could you be a bit more specific? Since 3RR does not apply to one's own edits, I don't see any point during the upload history of this image that 3RR was even close to being broken. Dar-Ape 04:57, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
71.100.105.21 IP bot?
How were you able to tell that 71.100.105.21 was running an IP bot? He had only made 6 edits. While I do believe that he was a vandal and deserved the blocking, I was just wondering why you put that statement there. Thanks for the help, - Hairchrm 03:47, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- 71.100.105.21 IS running an IP bot; please see this user's contributions Meteoroid 03:50, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- I did check, couldn't he (/she) just have copy/pasted? That is easy, and wouldn't most bots post more than just 6 edits?? - Hairchrm 04:06, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Vandalism
Thanx for reverting vandalism to my talk page..I reported him at WP:AIV but they did nothing about it so he again vandalised my page--Cometstyles 19:26, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Image links
Thanks. :-) -/- Warren 00:05, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- You were actually using <pre>Image:Example.png</pre> instead of [[:Image:Example.png]]<br />. — Meteoroid ← 00:34, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
re: rfa
Thank you Meteoroid for the nom, but I feel I must decline. The thing is, I have not been very active recently, so therefore I have not gotten a chance to show the community how I would do in a dispute other than the way I used to deal with disputes when I was new. Also, I have not participated in XfD's recently, due to my inactivity, and have not shown the community how I deal in XfD's. I do plan on becoming more active in the near future and then I might try again at RfA, but now is not the time. GeorgeMoney (talk) 06:26, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
I would like to thank you for the award that you gave me on February 11th. I have not been active recently so I did not see it until today. As it is my first award, it made me very happy. --β·σ·μ·η·ς·γ 06:19, 20 February 2007 (UTC)