|Archive 1 — January / February 2006
Archive 2 — March / April 2006
- 1 Better source request for File:Windows ActiveX security warning (malware).png
- 2 Nomination of Criticism of Windows Vista for deletion
- 3 Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox Windows component
- 4 Every single one of your contributions to the Trusted Computing article has been deleted
- 5 Windows XP visual styles
- 6 Orphaned non-free image File:Windows Explorer search puppy.png
- 7 ArbCom elections are now open!
Better source request for File:Windows ActiveX security warning (malware).png
Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:
You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 21:06, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Criticism of Windows Vista for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Criticism of Windows Vista is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of Windows Vista (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.17:09, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Template:Infobox Windows component has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox OS component. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. 02:04, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Every single one of your contributions to the Trusted Computing article has been deleted
The unanimous opinion of everyone on the discussion page was that your contributions were absolutely worthless. Congratulations! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Windkin (talk • contribs) 20:58, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Windows XP visual styles
I see that you've previously edited Windows XP visual styles and thought that ou may be interested to know that it has been nominated for deletion. The discussion is here if you'd like to comment. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:28, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Windows Explorer search puppy.png
Thanks for uploading File:Windows Explorer search puppy.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)