User talk:Serols

Hi

Why did you removed my edits from the zoo? It was correct! Thanks! 2001:56A:7B14:CC00:DDF2:13F3:4A27:E79D (talk) 18:04, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 2001:56A:7B14:CC00:DDF2:13F3:4A27:E79D, all your edits are unsourced. --Serols (talk) 18:21, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Please don't delete the article becuzz I just added two words of the name of Orang National Park becuzz it was not added. And...... I am originally from Assam and I did visit the National park so I think I did it right, but if u don't want to keep it then its ur choice. Thanks, Hemraj Whale dolphin3 (talk) 15:45, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry 😅 Whale dolphin3 (talk) 15:46, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	I agree with Volten001. Thank you very much for 100,000 contributions in the last year, and looking forward to 100,000 more. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:49, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Hey Serols nice user name and i dont do vandelism Im sorry if i did😁😁😁 Jayden1200 (talk) 13:22, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Arthur Conan Doyle

You removed my edit on Conan Doyle's page, I edited it as he is Scottish, as he was born in Scotland as stated on his page, you removed this edit, why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Faceitengland (talk • contribs) 14:23, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Faceitengland, is there a scottish passport, is Scotland a separate state? Regards --Serols (talk) 14:27, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So why do some pages say Scottish, some say English? and the other say British? Faceitengland (talk) 14:29, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shakespeare for example, is English, either edit that, or Doyle is Scottish Faceitengland (talk) 14:31, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Faceitengland, only the nationality is the correct designation. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:34, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain? Nationality is the correct designation? For who/what? As you said for Scotland, England doesn't have a passport, nor is it a separate state, so Shakespeare is by accounts British then. Faceitengland (talk) 14:36, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Faceitengland, please read the talk page -> Talk:Arthur_Conan_Doyle#RfC_about_Arthur_Conan_Doyle's_nationality. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:51, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have, you didn't answer my question though, please read above and answer. Faceitengland (talk) 14:55, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Faceitengland, I'm sure you know what I mean. Please use the talk page until a consensus is found. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:05, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For your information...

Thanks for reverting vandalism on Wikipedia! However, I'd like to bring up something that I believe we talked about years ago. Someone vandalized the Brontosaurus article, which I reverted. I was going to leave a warning on the vandal's talk page, but I got an edit conflict notice and found out that you warned the user. It must have happened because I edit-conflicted you, but as you're a Huggle user, the program went on warning the person anyway. It's OK if you don't have any control over it; just thought I'd let you know. Keep fighting those vandals! --LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 18:07, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello LPS and MLP Fan, the warning was initiated by me and not automatically. In the last few weeks, users have appeared again and again, who have actively participated in combating vandalism, but have not left any warnings with the relevant IPs/users. As a result, they could vandalise for hours. With Huggle you can immediately see if a user has been warned, if not, you can generate the warning. Unfortunately, I didn't pay attention to the fact that you were the one, who had initiated the revert and are making the warning manually and not automatically, which takes a little longer. You know what you're doing, so I want to apologize for taking the warning off you. Best wishes --Serols (talk) 14:15, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see now. No worries, and happy editing! LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 17:21, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wealthiest Historical Figures

Hello, I am trying to fix inaccurate claims on the page listing the wealthiest historical figures. Can you explain why you keep on reverting my changes?

Hello GaloisCategories, you know what the word historical means? --Serols (talk) 11:16, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well I would say that it is a bit ambiguous when something becomes historical. One could argue that anything in the past (such as elon musk reaching a net worth of 340.4 billion dollars on november 4th) is a historical event. However, I can understand that there is some grey area of how the word 'historical' might be interpreted. The issue is that when someone searches 'richest ever person' into google, this is the first article that appears. As a result, I think it is misleading to not list currently alive people who are richer than anyone who has ever lived in the past. GaloisCategories (talk) 11:39, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello GaloisCategories, then we wait until there is a consensus on the article talk page. --Serols (talk) 11:45, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is already concensus on the talk page that the article is inaccurate, and needs to be updated with current information. GaloisCategories (talk) 11:54, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello GaloisCategories, the word historical is actually clearly defined. --Serols (talk) 11:57, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed it is. According to google, 'historical' means "of or concerning history or past events". In other words, something that occurred on the 4th of November 2021 is historical. GaloisCategories (talk) 12:16, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bruce W Nickerson

I feel that I followed guidelines with my addition of the link. It 100% reinforces content.

All facts considered, Mr. Nickerson paid my company for that article. Please put back. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.250.9.11 (talk) 21:27, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 96.250.9.11, please note Wikipedia:Weblinks, no links in the flowtext. --Serols (talk) 15:38, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have to ask...

How the heck are you so fast with your vandal reversions? I saw a revert of that IP you were dealing with just now and joined in watching its contribs, and you were reverting it within seconds on most of its edits. I've never managed to be that fast dealing with vandals. Impressive work! Tony Fox (arf!) 18:06, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tony Fox, I use the program Wikipedia:Huggle. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:11, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aha! I've always used Twinkle, I may have to take a closer look at Huggle if it's that effective. Thanks! Tony Fox (arf!) 18:14, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for all your hard work of reverting vandalism! DiegoonusRHF (talk) 19:07, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What’s the deal

Hey I fixed a spelling mistake and you immediately remove it and post something on my talk page. OK, we don’t agree about spelling. But why put crap on so much talk page as though I did something wrong just because I don’t agree with your opinion on spelling? Why do we need to prowl around with electronic programs making a bad faith reverts of things that are really not hurtful in the first place and should be reviewed by a person before being reverted? 50.253.217.169 (talk) 17:14, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 50.253.217.169, please note and accept the aticle title. --Serols (talk) 17:24, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding recent edits on “Abyssinian”

Hey Serols, I have an abyssinian cat. And I am not happy that they are being calledd the biggest clowns of the animal kingdom. Could you elaboratr and provide me with a source. 89.17.155.85 (talk) 16:01, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shelly Kagan

Why did you decided to remove my version with his date of birth added? Vi jackson (talk) 23:08, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Vi jackson, please note Wikipedia:Weblinks, no links in the flowtext. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:31, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Maria Petrova (figure skater)

Thanks. emergency emailed --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:17, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dunlop

I edited tge Dunlop Tires page to reflect the official spelling of the word as Dunlop uses it to 'Tire' from 'Tyre' and you rolled back my edit citing 'disruotive editing. Please explain. 131.150.87.52 (talk) 13:37, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 131.150.87.52, please note Wikipedia:Article_titles#Use_commonly_recognizable_names and please use reliable sources. --Serols (talk) 13:40, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cary Joji Fukunaga

"Cary Joji Fukunaga, but you didn't provide a source" - Completely false. The source of the information was literally provided with the text. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.54.10.194 (talk) 12:24, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 216.54.10.194, please stop posting nonsense. --Serols (talk) 15:15, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

He's Back Again

Hi Serols, that persistent disruptive editing person who has been blocked many times using different ip addresses over the past few years is back again, up 2603.6011.DF01 his last edit was the Jersey City Fire Department which I fixed. This ip address is partially blocked from 4 pages by Deepfriedokra. Please assist in blocking this fully for a reasonable amount of time. Thank you, Doriden (talk) 15:54, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is the ip 2603:6011:df01:073:7171 , the last disruptive edit was the Jersey City Fire Department page, which I fixed. I sent him a talk note. He needs to be blocked fully for a time of your choosing. Thanks again, Doriden (talk) 16:01, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Doriden, I see you already got the answer. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:43, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thanks again for your assistance. As I mentioned earlier this person has been doing this nonsense for several years and has been blocked many times using different ip addresses same subject matter and same editing "style". Thanks again, Doriden (talk) 16:57, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Well done fending off those guys at Killnet till the end. ~~ lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me • contribs) 17:46, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Doublure (bookbinding)

Hi Serols, I noticed that a week or two ago you undid some edits by User:Wooster12 in which they added links to the British Library's bookbindings database and manuscripts library. In doing so the edits were characterised as 'advertising/promotion' and I was wondering if you had a moment to go over the reason for that conclusion? Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 10:04, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Richard Nevell (WMUK), the entries did not correspond to the rules of Wikipedia:Weblinks, no links in the flowtext. Regards --Serols (talk) 10:51, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Serols By 'flowtext' do you mean 'External links normally should not be placed in the body of an article'? If so, that was indeed the case for most of those edits, though not all. Perhaps it would be appropriate to add them to the external links section rather than as links in the body of the article, since they were contextually appropriate and direct readers to useful information? Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 13:27, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Richard Nevell (WMUK), this was a text link and this is not allowed, see Wikipedia:Weblinks. Regards --Serols (talk) 13:39, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Serols This sounds like an issue with formatting rather than promotion or advertising. Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 13:41, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Richard Nevell (WMUK), text links are promotion or advertising, therefore not allowed. Regards --Serols (talk) 13:45, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Then it would be fine if the links were added as references or to the external links section? Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 13:52, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Richard Nevell (WMUK), as references or to the external links section, Paper marbling only as reference, maximum Weblinks are five links. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:34, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Serols While I endorse the principle that the number of links in external links sections should be kept to a minimum (per WP:ELPOINTS) so that they constitute a curated list which is valuable to readers, the guideline does not seem to specify a maximum. I will advise the user concerned that the links can be re-added as references or to external links sections as appropriate. It is clear that the links were useful to readers, albeit the formatting could have been different.

I would also add that leaving three messages on the user's talk page in the space of a minute may have been a bit excessive. In future, it might be worth waiting to see if the first message has an effect before issuing further ones. Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 16:22, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Nevell (WMUK), the messeges were correct, because there was a risk that the user would continue. The links weren't really an added value either, as the weblinks/references contain better examples. Only the article Queens' Binder would be a link in the correct formatting ok. --Serols (talk) 15:41, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The suggestion that explicitly linking to an item mentioned in an article as was the case with doublure isn't adding value is a curious one. Considering the editor in question had not edited since your initial message, subsequent ones were excessive and could have been off-putting. I appreciate that you look at hundreds of edits a day using Huggle, but please keep in mind that more haste and less speed may be helpful in some situations. Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 08:25, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Nevell (WMUK), since I don't have a crystal ball and can't see into the future, I can only access my experience. So I'm assuming the user will continue. The user can ask me at any time where the problem with his editing was. Everyone gets an explanation from me and also the appropriate help.

There are thousands of vandalism edits on Wikipedia every day, in some cases more than 10,000. There is even a program running in the background to deal with this onslaught. I invite you to help Wikipedia fight against vandalism. You'll quickly see, why it's so important, comply with the Wikipedia rules.

Another friendly note: Please get straight to the point in the future, what you want to get at. Question games are not for everyone and not everyone is as understanding as me.

And please start a new section on any talk page in the future and don't use an existing one like you did here. That makes no sense.

I think everything has been said and hereby close the discussion. Have a nice weekend. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:21, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why

Hey why you revert my edit 103.104.28.233 (talk) 07:30, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

103.104.28.233, please stop this nonsense. --Serols (talk) 07:33, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Hopefully it will distract you so I can get just one vandalism revert. You are just too fast for anything that isn't Huggle. Good job!

interstatefive (talk) - just another roadgeek 15:44, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cybersecurity article

Hello, you reverted a change I made for creating a separate article for cybersecurity. The rational behind this was in the article and now I brought it back to the talk section of cybersecurity article, but briefly it is:

Currently cybersecurity redirects to Computer Security, but nowadays it goes beyond computed security and is related to protecting things that depends on Information and Communication technology and that could have impacts where in the digital or the physical world.

could you consider this?

Pcoronaf (talk) 16:57, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Pcoronaf, I consider this. Regards --Serols (talk) 17:31, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Pcoronaf (talk) 19:22, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

50.74.56.130

Hi Serols, 50.74.56.130 has removed copyright violations and probably challenged the verifiability/neutrality of the material in good faith. I'm currently hoping for Alexf to remove the block as this wasn't vandalism. All the best, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:56, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ~ ToBeFree, thank you for the information. Very annoying, if I get the wrong one, don't understand, why the Ip deletes that without comment. Deleted the warnings on the IP talk page. Have a nice weekend. Regards --Serols (talk) 13:37, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No worries and thank you very much

Have a nice weekend too! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:04, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Türkiye

Republic of Turkey name change official as Republic of Türkiye 31 May 2022. United Nations confirmed this name. Why you reverted my changes? Konsercigo55 (talk) 15:38, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Konsercigo55, please wait until it's official, it's still a wish. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:41, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		You`ve beaten me like 5 times, amazing job! Dinosaur TrexXX33 (chat?) 16:50, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

This is your only warning, if you revert vandalism before I do again, you may be awarded barnstars without further notice. I will never be able to revert vandalism before noon in my time zone with RedWarn because of your godly revert speed. Good job! interstate five 15:58, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(TALK PAGE STALKER) I am not saying this again, interstatefive, beat me to reverts again and i'm giving you a big, epic barnstar along with Serols. Haha! Dinosaur TrexXX33 (chat?) 17:39, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked Magikid Magikidmusicentertainment (talk) 21:53, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Non-great revert on Finland-NATO relations

Hi - at [1] you reverted an IP. It wasn't a great edit by any means (and I reverted the IP again when they tried to make it again), but I definitely don't think it was disruptive editing, since there actually is a there there (Denmark pre-ratifying the protocol could well be worthy of mention, but it's not ratification and the tweet is unusable as a source). You do a lot of good work fighting vandalism and it's appreciated, but please be careful with the use of powerful tools so that good-faith contributors aren't being cut by them. FrankSpheres (talk) 16:58, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello FrankSpheres, please note Wikipedia:Weblinks no social links. And the IP didn't get a warning either, it was just a revert. So I can't understand your comment. Regards --Serols (talk) 17:17, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's the edit summary, the substantive part of which is 'disruptive edits', and that there was no attempt to communicate with the IP about why they got reverted and what would make the edit stick. That's really not a great experience for a new contributor. FrankSpheres (talk) 17:29, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FrankSpheres social links are disruptive. --Serols (talk) 17:39, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, that's not right. There are several cases where tweets can be perfectly valid sources and not in the least disruptive. First, as a self-published primary source (e.g., uncontroversial claims about a BLP sourced to the subject's own Twitter), as described by WP:TWEET. Second, reliable or official sources can publish on Twitter (e.g., in the article in question, Finland-NATO relations, there's a citation of a statement posted to the official Twitter account of the President of Finland, which is absolutely fine; another example could be a newspaper's official Twitter account). Third, where the tweet itself is being discussed (e.g., on dril), linking to it obviously makes sense. There are probably other cases too. Links to social media aren't fundamentally different to links to any random website and aren't innately disruptive. FrankSpheres (talk) 17:54, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FrankSpheres, Wikipedia:External_links#Links_normally_to_be_avoided -> 10. --Serols (talk) 18:03, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That page is specifically talking about external links included for their value as resources related to the article (typically in the 'External links' section), and not for links used as citations or references. See point 1 of the same page under 'Important points to remember'. The edit in question clearly meant to use the tweet as a source. FrankSpheres (talk) 18:10, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FrankSpheres, twitter links are only to be used in special cases and that is absolutely not the case with this topic. The link was nonsense and you know that too, see your comment on the IP talk page. But I find it very positive that you stand up for another user. I think everything has been said and hereby close the discussion. Have a nice week. Regards --Serols (talk) 17:30, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for you!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Your talk page is full of barnstars, and you definitely deserve all of them. Here's another one for all the good work you have done!

47.227.95.73 (talk) 13:45, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 47.227.95.73, thanks. Have a nice week. Regards --Serols (talk) 13:47, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

I want to unblock my wikipedia account Magikid I don't know why it blocked, please help me out Magikidmusicentertainment (talk) 17:40, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Magikidmusicentertainment, I cannot see any block. --Serols (talk) 17:44, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Serols: Hello, Serols. Just wanted to say something; I assume this user is a troll account as he is blanking multiple pages, he also left me a message on my talk page regarding the same thing, just wanted to let you know. Din oz1 (chat?) 22:20, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi why i was distrupted edit?🥺

Just would like to know as title mentioned. Kulchartt (talk) 19:50, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Serols

Can i get your email to have the better communication. I dont know how to chat with you.

I would like to know why my edit was distrupted and i do not understand that you said you didn't see any block.

My email kulchart.t@gmail.com

Thanks Kulchart Kulchartt (talk) 10:43, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kulchartt, my talk page is the right place to communicate with me.

Now to your question.

Your edit was your personal opinion and not backed by a source. Unfortunately, this doesn't belong in an Encyclopedia. This also has no place in an Encyclopedia: Hope this help, Kulchart -> see here. That's why I reverted your edits. I hope I was able to make you understand the reasonsI hope I was able to make you understand the reasons. Regards --Serols (talk) 13:44, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Serol,

If i have a source link so i may be able to put my opinion there right?

Br, Kulchart Kulchartt (talk) 13:48, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kulchartt, with source and text written neutral that would be ok. Regards --Serols (talk) 13:50, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese characters

This a good characters Over 90000+ characters 2400:2412:2820:3F00:60C0:5C3A:7BE0:B5E4 (talk) 10:07, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese characters

This Chinese characters in the unified school. The only way, to 94753 Chinese characters in display

You can get it was a good day. This article is the unified Ideographs. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/12L5TKl2SJftZLYnZVa0-xOCKs_LGTz_JOwxJSuwR5Oo/edit?usp=drivesdk

2400:2412:2820:3F00:60C0:5C3A:7BE0:B5E4 (talk) 10:11, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese characters. CjKV

Is it the 94753 Chinese characters. 2400:2412:2820:3F00:60C0:5C3A:7BE0:B5E4 (talk) 10:19, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

94753 characters

This is the unified 94753 characters. Chinese keyboard. Is it was a 94753 Chinese characters. In the words of the 19384928 2400:2412:2820:3F00:60C0:5C3A:7BE0:B5E4 (talk) 10:21, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nikthymakis

I noticed that a message you recently left to Nikthymakis may have been unduly harsh. Please remember not to bite the newcomers. If you see others making a common mistake, consider politely pointing out what they did wrong and showing them how to correct it. It takes more time, but it helps us retain new editors. You were already aware, per [2] Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:50, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Talk to Andy, please think about what you write. Neither the user page nor the user talk page is a personal promotion site, see here Template:Db-spamuser. In addition, there is already a discussion on this topic and I would like to ask you to continue it there and not on my talk page. --Serols (talk) 13:59, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"please think about what you write" WP:NPA is, like WP:BITE still current, I believe. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:09, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Andy Mabbett, neither WP:NPA nor WP:BITE, but only my answer to your incomprehensible accusation. --Serols (talk) 14:26, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

hey i was just wondering why you removed the edit of the nickname on brian to’os page. it was already up, without problem, and i fixed it as it was incorrect. Word14 (talk) 18:03, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Word14, see here Wikipedia:Article_titles#Use_commonly_recognizable_names. Regards --Serols (talk) 07:54, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User page

Why do you not have a user page? AKK700 03:14, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello AKK, why I need an user page? --Serols (talk) 17:15, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Francisco Javier Arellano Félix

Accent marks added and speculation fixed. 18:08, 8 July 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by MurrayGreshler (talk • contribs)

Hiking Trails in Ushguli

Hi Serols, this is a free app with hiking trails in Svaneti, Ushguli and entire Georgia. So it is very valuable information for reader. 146.255.240.254 (talk) 12:50, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 146.255.240.254, please note Wikipedia:Weblinks, no shop links. Regards --Serols (talk) 12:52, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Its not a shop, its an app of trails, check it out. 146.255.240.254 (talk) 12:55, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 146.255.240.254, the website of your link offers no added value, the only function is the redirection to Google Play and App Store. --Serols (talk) 13:01, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	You always beat me during RCP. Scorpions13256 (talk) 22:02, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cline surname page

Why is it the German origin of the name is the only one allowed to be posted with no more citation than the Irish origin? Seems like someone is trying edit the surname history to their own narrative. I barely know how to navigate wikipedia let alone engage in "edit warring". I just want the page to have accurate and complete information. 104.184.173.159 (talk) 12:58, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 104.184.173.159, please use sources and please use the button Show changes before you publish, otherwise you will ruin the article, see here. --Serols (talk) 13:04, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

( Mac ) Kilcline, Mac Giolla Chlaoin ( claon , deceitful ) . A Co. Roscommon sept whose name has been widely abbreviated to Cline : Clynes is now the most usual synonym . SIF 97 . SURNAMES OF IRELAND, MacLysaght, Edward. 1973. PAGE 137 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.184.173.159 (talk) 16:07, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 104.184.173.159, now you are blocked. --Serols (talk) 17:09, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong imf

Bbb23 added worng imf in all Wikipedia pages https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dangal_(TV_channel) and deleted logo photo of dangl tv channel Devzerk (talk) 16:49, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]