Jump to content

User talk:Viewmont Viking

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Boobruh007 (talk | contribs) at 11:46, 15 August 2022 (→‎National Institute of Agricultural Marketing: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello Viewmont Viking, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. McDoobAU93 23:30, 10 June 2012

Oxide Games

Why did you completely delete all of the edits to the Oxide Games Wikipedia page? This is a prominent gaming company that is deserving of its own page that isn't a simple redirect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zebraman123 (talkcontribs) 13:42, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is a mistake

You say I was less than neutral, well disorder is not a neutral term and your revert was less than neutral. ZippyComb (talk) 15:45, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My edits

Hello, I just want to edit Turkish archery external links, the YouTube video is my video, I just want to edit HINCAL to my name, but you revert it, that’s mistakeHoodarcheryshop (talk) 19:37, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkish_archery#External_links

Deletion of contribution

Hello, may I ask why you have deleted the work I have just contributed?

Thanks,

MusicArticle (talk) 20:43, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of contribution/ changes

Sorry to disturb you, but I d'ont understand why you keep to reverting my edit ? I just wanted to add some details about this festival like the french article, by the way I'm working as an intern at the department in charge of the organization of this festival so it's okay for them. Can you explain me the reasons please ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fazilleau Jade (talkcontribs) 13:28, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have a Conflict of interest so you shouldn't be editing the article directly anyway, and WP in not for promoting your organization. --VVikingTalkEdits 15:24, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Undo-ing Revisions

It appears that every time I add information to the page, it is deleted. I was logged out of Wikipedia during my last edit, and so have remade it when I logged back in. I am not working with others - it seems that we both are adding information on the same topic. I will gladly stop adding their information back when I re-add my own if that is what it takes. I believe this information is relevant, as LGBTQ+ people are part of history everywhere and deserve to have their historic moments documented as well. Sparkerkc (talk) 19:45, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly, Autistic people like me have feelings too. We are not robots. Autism is a difference, not a disordr. ZippyComb (talk) 15:46, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What a mess. Please see WP:ENB#Undisclosed assignment from Kenyon College. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:26, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Vandalism

I am not vandalizing the wikipedia page for Danville, Alabama. Everything posted it true.

Then provide a reliable source and take it to the talk page --VVikingTalkEdits 13:44, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Danville is small and rural with no local newspapers or stations that i can use to cite. I get my knowledge of Danville from the fact that I am a resident of Danville. DNVL5132 (talk) 14:00, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

John Hagee

You properly undid the edit I recently made. I was adding information related to advocacy by the Reverend John Hagee in supporting former Alabama governor George Wallace in the 68 election. I did this by referencing an event that was hosted by Hagee at his church in supporting Wallace during the campaign cycle of that year in which thousands attended.

Because of the BLP, I need a source to make the edit, thank you because you helped me learn. This I fully accept as valid, both your edit and the reason for your edit. Kudos. I also would like to enlist your help, if possible. I have the source of the information. You see? I have the source. Now, what will happen if I put the source on the information? All under the assumption that the San Antonio Express newspaper is a valid source.

What other objections might you have with this being included assuming the source turns out to be legitimate in every sense, in other words, valid, and the information presented is valid? Also, let's leave any considerations of wording out of this, and even consider just is this information (if you find it legitimate sourced) valid to be included, in your opinion?

AggiesNeverLie (talk) 13:46, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead since there were no objections and placed the item back in the article along with the source. Thanks again for your time and effort in this to regulate content for the good of all. If I encounter you again in the future I shall be sure to say that you are a good editor. AggiesNeverLie (talk) 15:09, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
But i cited against post , you may consider external there is no issue , I think Kausikmaitra (talk) 04:31, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Strain Gauge Revision

Hello Viewmont Viking I am a new Wikipedia contributor so I have no idea if I write this in the correct spot. You wrote a message on my talk page concerning the revision I made to the strain gauge article. You apparently tagged it as spam or something like that and undid my revision according to the "View history" tag. However, it still shows my entrance in the article, so I wanted to ask if you wanted to undo all of it or only one part is in your eyes "promotional/spam content". Could you please clarify what you edited? I am doing this article revision as a project from university, so I would be glad to know what was or is going to be deleted so I can alter the text according to the Wikipedia guidelines. It was not my intention to create "promotional content" on the article. Thanks for your clarification. 194.230.158.12 (talk) 17:39, 20 May 2022 (UTC) Ps if the signing did not work my user tag is Pascalroth[reply]

Too much control in the free encyclopedia

"Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings."

it is all I have been added for a while:

"with benefits of using a broker - professional buyer who help facilitate vehicle purchases that require citizen to have business licenses.

Is it crime?

Andrei Doroshin

Hi, Thank you for writing on my talk page. The article about Doroshin is frankly slanderous and should be directed at the company Philly Fighting Covid, not the person. I have copied the information from the page to create the Philly Fighting Covid page. Multiple people on the talk page for andrei seem to agree that he is note notable enough to have a Wikipedia page. He hasnt made any public statements in recent times and I cannot find anything on him other than his publication. Would you please help me in transitioning the page from Doroshin to PFC? — Preceding unsigned comment added by FlorisDurshuqitz (talkcontribs) 18:48, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was not trolling

Hi. I was not teolling when I changed the political ideolgt to political corruption. The labour party of malta is corrupt and in no way is related to any ideolgy Let's unite malta as one (talk) 23:17, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say you were Trolling or teolling, I said your edit wasn't constructive, which it wasn't. You need to provide a RS and have a NPOV. --VVikingTalkEdits 23:18, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I did not see your comment. I am new to this wiki. What is a RS and a NPOV Let's unite malta as one (talk) 23:25, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also sorry for my spelling mistakes. It is late in malta Let's unite malta as one (talk) 23:34, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable Source and Neutral Point of View

Rough Cut Woodworking Edits

Hello, I see you reverted my edits to the Rough cut page, they were intended clear up confusion. Bots are attaching that page to the wrong Tom on social media platform pop up’s. There should be two separate pages one for rough cut woodworking with Tommy Mac and one for Classic woodworking (formerly known as rough cut with fine woodworking) Please check the pages cited link as some are dead now and the links below. You’ll see that Classic woodworking starts at season one despite how it was initially released. https://www.finewoodworking.com/section/classic-woodworking https://openvault.wgbh.org/catalog/V_272048342B4241008E31FFF037C51C7D — Preceding unsigned comment added by ClockWorkDork (talkcontribs) 16:40, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My Posts Were Not Advertising

Hello VViking, thanks for you update and message. Can you please explain why my contributions were considered advertising? I just looked at my edits and see that many of them were reverted, including a translation of Italian (on the Tosca page) that is far more accurate than what was previously there. Can you please explain how this works and why I was marked for advertising? Thank you, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ottostark1 (talkcontribs) 16:33, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Partnership for Maternal, Newborn & Child Health

Someone has been vandalizing in-between your edits and I accidentally undid them. Feel free to put them back. Veryfactualedits (talk) 17:45, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Accuracy complaints are verifiability complaints

Hi Viewmont Viking, due to the AIV report about Debanjanepiskey's alleged "not here to build an encyclopedia" behavior, I'm currently looking through their edits and find myself restoring most of them, as the user has voiced concerns about the factual accuracy of statements that lack proper sourcing, and that improperly sourced material was restored by experienced editors who should know better. Best regards, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:34, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jürgen

Hi, Why did you delete the link to my webpage in Black Market International? I would like to have this link as I have entered it. Many greetings, Jürgen Fritz

Jürgen Fritz (talk) 15:10, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May I ask for some clarification or advice, please?

Hello Viewmont Viking, I just made an edit to a list of companies in my country by adding a new one. I used references to show that the information is correct but you deleted it and just said "No". Sorry to bother you but could you explain what that means and what I have done wrong? Thank you very much in advance! FaithIronMarks (talk) 09:50, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, well

Your opponent didn't exactly have coprolalia, but it was close enough. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:40, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Very true, I don't think I will be hiring the organization anytime soon to discuss my Chief Marketing Officers job.--VVikingTalkEdits 18:50, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Marilyn Horne as notable alumni of Music Academy of the West

Hello Viemont Viking, in an edit to the Music Academy of the West article you removed Marilyn Horne from the list of notable alumni. Could you elaborate on why you think Marilyn Horne should not be listed there? She attended the program in 1953 under founding member Lotte Lehmann, as stated in the article Marilyn Horne, and later became head of the voice program herself, a position she held for 21 years. Seems pretty notable to me. Is your objection based on the fact that her name was not linked to her article? That's fixed now. Greetings, OrestesLebt (talk) 07:47, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

National Institute of Agricultural Marketing

Hello VViking !! You have deleted the content added in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Institute_of_Agricultural_Marketing. This is a Institute under Government of India & the content added is not promotional its about the institute and its activities. Since its a Government of India Institute and no things added here are for promotion, Its for the awareness who wants to know about the Institute. Please check the Institute website https://ccsniam.gov.in/ so that you can understand. Boobruh007 (talk) 11:46, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]