Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy Braun

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Liz (talk | contribs) at 02:45, 17 August 2022 (→‎Timothy Braun: Closed as soft delete (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. This is a soft delete so if reliable sources become available with future success, this article can be restored. I don't think Draftifying is a good idea with a 16 year old article that is unlikely to receive any attention and be deleted in 6 months. Liz Read! Talk! 02:45, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Timothy Braun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Put aside the promotional factors of this article, and it appears that the subject fails WP:NPROF and WP:GNG.

I struggled to find reliable secondary sources that discuss the subject. Only content the subject has written.

Thanks for reviewing and assuming good faith. Missvain (talk) 00:01, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--Jahaza (talk) 18:04, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:31, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment The subject might be notable by the comment above (plays being reviewed? similar to authors' notability criteria? but the page needs work to establish criteria of notability. Maybe draftify the page? JamesKH76 (talk) 08:30, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.